8730 Wilshire Boulevard, California 90211 top-bar-image

Get Help Now

Phone Icon1-800-529-8255
1-800-529-8255
August 07, 2026 05 min

Can You Sue for Punitive Damages in a Product Liability Case?

product liability claims attorney

Yes, you can sue for punitive damages in a product liability case, or any other injury case for that matter. If the victim presents clear and convincing evidence that the defendant intentionally disregarded a known risk, the court may award punitive damages.

Punitive damages may also be available when a product contains a dangerous design defect that creates an unreasonable risk of harm. In some cases, manufacturers may be accused of continuing to market products despite known safety concerns.

Many states limit the amount of punitive damages. California doesn’t have a punitive damages cap, but indirect limits exist. Under federal law, punitive damages must be “reasonable and proportionate” to the harm suffered. Under California Civil Code §3294, courts must consider the reprehensibility of the conduct, the actual harm, and the defendant’s net worth.

When unsafe products cause injuries and unsympathetic companies deny responsibility, a Los Angeles product liability claims attorney advocates for victims. This advocacy always begins with a comprehensive and compassionate case evaluation and ends with maximum compensation for your serious injuries.

What Are Punitive Damages?

Punitive damages, or exemplary damages, go beyond standard financial compensation for economic losses, like medical bills, and noneconomic losses, like emotional distress. These damages replace out-of-pocket losses and losses directly related to the injury. Punitive damages, which somewhat resemble criminal fines, punish wrongful behavior and discourage similar misconduct in the future.

In California, punitive damages are governed by California Civil Code Section 3294. A plaintiff must prove that the defendant acted with:

  • Malice: Basically, a company acts maliciously when it knows it’s doing the wrong thing and continues that course of conduct. Reckless indifference could also be malicious.
  • Oppression: People oppress each other when they use their superior power to get their way and impose their will. Oppression is usually the easiest punitive damages element for a Los Angeles product liability claims attorney to prove.
  • Fraud: Fraudulent actors cover their tracks and lie to get what they want. Many companies bury negative product information, like serious medication side effects, and lie about these things when asked.

This standard goes well beyond ordinary negligence. In a California product liability case, courts usually award punitive damages when a company knowingly sells dangerous products or deliberately ignores consumer safety.

How Does California Product Liability Law Work?

How Does California Product Liability Law Work

California follows strict product liability laws, which means injured consumers do not always need to prove negligence. Instead, they must typically show that:

  • The product was defective,
  • The defect existed when it left the manufacturer or seller, and
  • The defect caused injuries or damages.

The Big Three apply to manufacturing defects, design defects, and failure to warn issues, the three main kinds of product defect cases in California.

A manufacturing defect occurs when a product differs from its intended design due to an error during production. Defective Takata airbags are a good example. The company replaced a stable and reliable propellant with ammonium nitrate, a very unstable and unreliable propellant. Millions of vehicles with defective Takata airbags have been recalled, and according to most estimates, millions more are still on the road.

A design defect exists when the product’s design is inherently dangerous, even if manufactured correctly. Certain pharmaceutical products have been the subject of design defect allegations when evidence suggested the risks associated with the product outweighed its benefits. These side effects include liver damage, anaphylactic reactions, blood issues, and serious heart problems.

Companies may also be liable for failing to provide adequate warnings or instructions regarding potential risks associated with their products.

When Are Punitive Damages Available in California Product Liability Cases?

Punitive damages are not automatically awarded in every California product liability lawsuit. Courts reserve these damages for cases involving egregious misconduct. Examples that may justify punitive damages include:

  • A manufacturer knowingly selling a dangerous product,
  • Concealing known safety defects from consumers,
  • Ignoring repeated reports of injuries,
  • Falsifying safety test results, and
  • Failing to issue recalls despite known hazards.

For example, if a company discovers that a defective auto part could cause fatal crashes but continues selling it without warning consumers, a California court may consider punitive damages appropriate.

What Evidence Is Needed to Prove Punitive Damages?

As mentioned, to recover punitive damages in California, a Los Angeles product liability claims attorney must provide “clear and convincing evidence” of misconduct. This standard is higher than the “preponderance of the evidence” standard used for ordinary damages. Strong evidence may include:

  • Internal company emails or memos,
  • Prior consumer complaints,
  • Internal or external safety reports,
  • Recall records,
  • Whistleblower testimony from former employees, and
  • Regulatory investigation outcomes.

If the evidence is strong, an eye-popping amount of punitive damages may be available. Money is the only language that most companies speak. So, punitive damages must be high enough to get their attention and force them to change the way they do business.

Tens of billions of dollars in punitive damages in a Johnson & Johnson talc-asbestos case may seem unreasonably high. But to a company with half a trillion dollars, that amount of punitive damages is little more than a parking ticket.

How Can You Protect Your Rights After a Defective Product Injury?

When manufacturers place profits ahead of consumer safety, the consequences can be devastating. California law allows injured consumers to pursue compensation for their losses and, in some cases, seek punitive damages when a company’s conduct goes beyond ordinary negligence.

At the Law Offices of Eslamboly Hakim, we help injury victims hold manufacturers, distributors, and other responsible parties accountable. Our team works to uncover critical evidence, build strong claims, and pursue the maximum compensation available under California law.

Punitive damages are available in extreme cases. For a free consultation with a product liability attorney in Los Angeles, contact the Law Offices of Eslamboly Hakim at 1-800-529-8255. The sooner you reach out to us, the sooner we start working for you.

Overwhelmed by your injury and its aftermath?

We’re here to ease your stress and guide you through every step of recovery.

Get Support Now

FAQs

No. Punitive damages are reserved for cases involving malice, oppression, or fraud. Most product liability claims only involve compensatory damages.

Compensatory damages reimburse victims for losses such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Punitive damages are intended to punish particularly wrongful conduct and deter similar behavior.

Plaintiffs typically need clear and convincing evidence, such as internal company documents, safety reports, consumer complaints, recall records, or witness testimony showing a conscious disregard for consumer safety.

Yes. California courts may award punitive damages when a manufacturer knowingly sells a dangerous product, conceals safety defects, falsifies testing results, or engages in other egregious misconduct.

In most cases, injured consumers have two years from the date of injury to file a lawsuit. Certain circumstances may affect this deadline.

Product liability cases often involve complex evidence, multiple defendants, and extensive corporate records. An attorney can help investigate the defect, identify liable parties, and pursue available compensation.

Category: Product Liability
Reviewer
Posted by Sharona Hakim

I like the fight – the fight to hold Big Insurance accountable, the fight to find justice for real people, and the fight to level the playing field for...Read More